Seven domains at production depth. Integration is the heaviest at 19%, and items test design judgement under competing constraints.
CCAR-P reports on a scaled range of 100–1000 with a cut at 720, and its questions are distributed across 7 domains by published weight rather than evenly. Those weights are the single most useful thing in the exam guide: they tell you where the marks are, and they rarely match where candidates spend their time.
| Domain | Share of exam | Approx. questions |
|---|---|---|
| Domain 1 — Solution Design and Architecture | 17.0% | 11 |
| Domain 2 — Claude Models, Prompting, and Context Engineering | 13.0% | 8 |
| Domain 3 — Integration | 19.0% | 12 |
| Domain 4 — Evaluation, Testing, and Optimization | 16.0% | 10 |
| Domain 5 — Governance, Safety, and Risk Management | 14.0% | 9 |
| Domain 6 — Stakeholder Communication and Lifecycle Management | 14.0% | 9 |
| Domain 7 — Developer Productivity and Operational Enablement | 7.0% | 4 |
Integration is the heaviest at 19.0% — roughly 12 of the 63 questions. Weakness there costs more than weakness anywhere else, which is exactly what a flat percentage score hides and what a blueprint-weighted estimate surfaces.
Our CCAR-P bank holds 400 original items across 20 objectives, each with an explanation and a note on every option — why the right answer is right, and why each distractor fails. Items are written against the published objectives. None is recalled or reproduced from a live exam.
A drill allocates questions by the published domain weights, multiplied by how far your measured mastery sits below standard. So a domain worth 19% of the exam that you are weak in dominates your next sitting, while one you have already mastered drops back to an exposure floor that keeps its estimate current.
A 20-item diagnostic for CCAR-P, spread across objectives rather than taken off the top, so the sample reflects the shape of the exam. It produces a first readiness estimate and full explanations, whether or not you go on to buy.