Drawn from the fifteen objectives missed on 17 August. Short drills weight toward the objectives scored 0%.
CCAR-F reports on a scaled range of 100–1000 with a cut at 720, and its questions are distributed across 15 domains by published weight rather than evenly. Those weights are the single most useful thing in the exam guide: they tell you where the marks are, and they rarely match where candidates spend their time.
| Domain | Share of exam | Approx. questions |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate multi-agent orchestration patterns — coordinator-worker, parallel, sequential | 6.7% | 4 |
| Evaluate subagent delegation strategies — goal-oriented vs procedural | 6.7% | 4 |
| Select the appropriate agentic review architecture — plan mode, direct, multi-phase | 6.7% | 4 |
| Construct self-sufficient subagent prompts | 6.7% | 4 |
| Apply session resumption techniques | 6.7% | 4 |
| Design Claude Code review configurations | 6.7% | 4 |
| Apply the context: fork frontmatter option | 6.7% | 4 |
| Distinguish between MCP resources and tools | 6.7% | 4 |
| Write MCP tool descriptions that prevent misrouting | 6.7% | 4 |
| Integrate MCP servers — scope, authentication, discovery | 6.7% | 4 |
| Apply extraction accuracy patterns | 6.7% | 4 |
| Design extraction schemas — optional, nullable, enums | 6.7% | 4 |
| Apply systematic codebase exploration strategies | 6.7% | 4 |
| Select the appropriate built-in tool — Grep, Glob, Read, Bash | 6.7% | 4 |
| Configure Claude Code CLI for CI/CD pipelines | 6.7% | 4 |
Evaluate multi-agent orchestration patterns — coordinator-worker, parallel, sequential is the heaviest at 6.7% — roughly 4 of the 60 questions. Weakness there costs more than weakness anywhere else, which is exactly what a flat percentage score hides and what a blueprint-weighted estimate surfaces.
Our CCAR-F bank holds 405 original items across 15 objectives, each with an explanation and a note on every option — why the right answer is right, and why each distractor fails. Items are written against the published objectives. None is recalled or reproduced from a live exam.
A drill allocates questions by an equal share per objective, multiplied by how far your measured mastery sits below standard. So a domain worth 7% of the exam that you are weak in dominates your next sitting, while one you have already mastered drops back to an exposure floor that keeps its estimate current.
A 20-item diagnostic for CCAR-F, spread across objectives rather than taken off the top, so the sample reflects the shape of the exam. It produces a first readiness estimate and full explanations, whether or not you go on to buy.